Victory Against the Insurance Company

  • Home
  • Author: Test Test
  • Page 2

Victory Against the Insurance Company

One of the insurance companies operating in the Republic of Armenia filed a claim against our client, Y.S., demanding reimbursement of a paid insurance amount, based on the right of recourse. A few days after our office’s attorney, Edgar Ayvazyan, took on the representation of Y.S. and filed a motion to apply the statute of limitations, the insurance company withdrew its claim (Civil Case No. ԱՐԱԴ/0951/02/24). Thus, another victory was added to our office’s extensive and effective practice of representing individuals in cases against insurance companies.
Read more

By Decision of the Administrative Court, Court Bailiffs Will Receive the Military Pension Due for Their Long-Term Service

The Unified Social Service had refused to grant the military pension for long-term service to three of our office’s clients, effectively disregarding a significant portion of their work experience. As a result of the arguments presented by our office's lawyers, Tatevik Malkhasyan and Edgar Ayvazyan, the Administrative Court of the Republic of Armenia stated that the Unified Social Service had misinterpreted the legal regulations, and therefore ordered it to grant our clients the pensions they are entitled to (Administrative cases No. ՎԴ5/0637/05/24, ՎԴ5/0637/05/24, ՎԴ5/0639/05/24). We thank Judge Narek Gasparyan for issuing a fair judicial act.
Read more

Victory in the case of our 6 foreign defendants accused of serious crimes

Thanks to a well-chosen defense strategy and the objective approach shown by the investigator of the RA Investigative Committee and the supervising prosecutor, the charges brought against the defendants under Article 319(1), Article 257(3)(1,3), Article 285(2)(1,3), and Article 296(3)(1,3) of the RA Criminal Code (participation in a criminal organization, large-scale computer fraud by a criminal organization, aiding the unlawful activity of companies considered legal entities under the instruction of a criminal organization leader, and large-scale money laundering by a criminal organization) were modified in their favor at the final stage of the pre-trial investigation — with the charges under Article 285(2)(1,3) and Article 296(3)(1,3) being dropped.
Read more