Our Client Accused of a Serious Crime Will Remain Free

  • Home
  • Author: Test Test
  • Page 3

Our Client Accused of a Serious Crime Will Remain Free

In a criminal case initiated in June 2025 by Investigative Division of Erebuni and Nubarashen administrative districts of the Yerevan City Investigative Division of the Investigative Committee of the Republic of Armenia, our office’s attorney, Andranik Mnatsakanyan, represented the client V.H., who was charged under Article 166, Part 2, Clause 6 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia for a serious crime—infliction of grievous bodily harm to another person using a pre-prepared item. A mediation was also filed with the First Instance Court of General Jurisdiction of Yerevan City to impose detention as a preventive measure.
Read more

Our Client Wrongfully Accused of a Serious Crime Was Released from Detention

In a criminal proceeding initiated by the General Department for the Investigation of Economic Crimes and Smuggling of the Investigative Committee of the Republic of Armenia, public criminal prosecution had been initiated against our office’s client, A.V., represented by attorney Andranik Mnatsakanyan, under Article 290, Part 3, Clause 2 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia — for the alleged commission of a serious crime (namely, large-scale tax evasion). A decision had also been made to detain him in order to petition the court to impose detention as a preventive measure.
Read more

The Anti-Corruption Court of Armenia Confirmed the Legality of Our Client’s Property Acquisition

The Anti-Corruption Court of Armenia, having examined the claim filed by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Republic of Armenia to invalidate the auction of land plots located in the Nairi community and to apply the consequences of invalidity, decided by a ruling on April 28, 2025, to satisfy the claim only partially — rejecting it entirely with regard to the consequences. Specifically, the Court rightfully stated that despite the auction being declared invalid, our client A.T. acquired the land plot through a lawful procedure and acted in good faith. Therefore, the subsequent acquisition of this property by our client and the registration of ownership under their name cannot be deemed invalid (civil case No. ՀԿԴ/0172/02/23). We thank Judge Lili Drmeyan for delivering a well-reasoned and fair judicial act.
Read more