Our Client, Accused of Serious Crimes, Released from Detention

The criminal prosecution against our client on charges of tax evasion exceeding AMD 2.8 billion has been terminated, and the criminal proceedings have been closed on rehabilitative grounds

As early as March 25, 2024, within the framework of a criminal case investigated by the Investigative Committee of the Republic of Armenia, public criminal prosecution was initiated against our client A.Kh. on charges of tax evasion in the amount of AMD 2,872,891,536. The defense of the accused in this criminal case was undertaken by Gurgen Nersisyan, partner attorney of the “LSA” Law Firm, who represented the interests of the accused and the company founded by him not only within the criminal proceedings, but also during the comprehensive tax audit appointed at the initiative of the pre-trial investigative body, as well as within the scope of forensic accounting examinations conducted in the case.
Read more

Our client, unjustly accused of a particularly serious crime, has been released from prolonged detention

In the criminal proceedings that have been under investigation for a long period of time by the Main Department for the Investigation of Economic Crimes and Smuggling of the Investigative Committee of the Republic of Armenia, public criminal prosecution was initiated in July 2025 against R.N., a client of our firm’s attorney Andranik Mnatsakanyan, under Article 296, Part 3, Point 3 of the Criminal Code of the Republic of Armenia, for the alleged commission of a particularly serious crime (money laundering on an especially large scale). In addition, detention was applied to him as a preventive measure.
Read more

The Civil Court of Appeal Restored Our Client’s Violated Property Right to an Inherited Apartment

In civil case No. ED/57083/02/21, examined by the Court of General Jurisdiction of First Instance of Yerevan, the court of first instance had upheld the claim filed against our client and recognized the claimant as an heir who had accepted the inheritance on the basis of factual possession, thereby declaring invalid the state registration of ¾ of our client A.B.’s ownership right. The court had also dismissed our counterclaim seeking the eviction of the unlawful possessor(s) of the apartment.
Read more